Analyzing critical legal trends and developments across data, cyber, AI and digital regulations from around the world and beyond borders

New contractual obligations and restrictions on their use.

In brief

On 15 May 2026, amendments to the Federal Labor Law and the Federal Copyright Law took effect, strengthening the protection of performing artists regarding the use of their voice, image, and performances, particularly in digital environments and artificial intelligence.

Key takeaways

The reform introduces new contractual obligations and establishes significant restrictions on the use of voice, image, and performances, including their use through technologies and artificial intelligence (AI), significantly affecting companies that create AI platforms or train models for the creation of synthetic characters, as well as advertising, marketing, media, and entertainment companies, digital platforms, radio stations, television networks, dubbing companies, and campaigns featuring artistic talent. In practice, it requires greater clarity regarding the scope of the rights granted and reinforces the need for specific consents, with a direct impact on the creative, advertising, and digital industries.

In more detail

  • Contractual obligations. Employment contracts with performing artists must expressly stipulate the conditions and remuneration applicable to the use of their voice and image, including their use through AI systems or other technologies, among other requirements such as number of copies or print run, distribution channels and platforms, geolocation, duration, and territories. This is important because, in case of doubt, the interpretation most favorable to the artist will prevail.
  • Protection of images, voices, and performances.
    • Voice as a protected asset. The voice is recognized as a protected element, with protection extended to results generated by AI systems or other technologies.
    • Express, specific, and limited consent. The use of a voice, image, or performance will require express consent and shall be strictly limited to the agreed-upon purposes and terms.
    • Additional exploitation subject to authorization. Any other use will require new authorization and remuneration.
    • Limited exceptions. Unauthorized use is permitted in limited cases (parody, satire, or creative imitation), provided there is no professional substitution of the artist or risk of confusion.
  • Artificial Intelligence
    • Recognition within the legal framework. Artificial intelligence is incorporated as part of the legal framework applicable to computer programs.
    • Regulated cloning and simulation. Artists may authorize or prohibit the cloning or simulation of their voice or performances using technologies or AI.
    • Prior written consent. Any use that generates identifiable clones or simulations will require prior written authorization, except in limited cases.
  • Expansion of performing artist concept. Broadcasters, commercial voice-over artists, and voice actors are expressly included as protected parties.
  • Advertising contracts. The reuse of campaigns after one year will require new authorizations and an update to the compensation. Furthermore, contracts must specify, among other elements, platforms, territories, and duration, and exclusivity or non-competition clauses may not exceed the term of the contract.
  • Dispute resolution. Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms are introduced, including settlement, mediation, conciliation, and arbitration

Practical implications for businesses

  • Review and update contracts
  • Clearly define authorized uses
  • Monitor reuse and campaign extensions
  • Obtain written authorizations for AI, cloning, or simulation
  • Assess the risk of penalties and disputes

Author

Carlos is a partner in Baker McKenzie's North America Intellectual Property Practice Group. He advises mainly on copyright, trademark, domain names, franchising and licensing, trade secrets protection, unfair competition, branding, advertising and protection in the digital environment, and privacy issues litigation. Carlos also heads the Firm’s Brand Enforcement department and investigation team, handling covert investigation and operations against counterfeit and piracy issues, as well as commercial and trademark use investigations.

Author

Carlos is one of Mexico's most active privacy, data protection and information security lawyers. He has implemented privacy management compliance programs for over 100 companies, including several Fortune 500 companies. He advises on corporate and commercial matters where privacy is an issue, including e-discovery, FCPA investigations, e-commerce, direct marketing, privacy in the workplace, litigation and M2M communications.

Author

Daniel Villanueva Plasencia is a member of Baker McKenzie’s Intellectual Property Practice Group in Guadalajara. He has extensive experience in intellectual and industrial property matters, including trademarks, patents and copyrights. Prior to joining the Firm, he was the founding partner of a local firm in Guadalajara.

Author

Marina leads Baker McKenzie’s patent practice in Mexico and has over fifteen years of experience advising on complex intellectual property matters, including patent prosecution, licensing and litigation, as well as utility models, industrial designs and trade secrets; she also has significant experience in life sciences, advertising and consumer law, and patent linkage, and serves as Vice President of the IP Committee of the International Chamber of Commerce in Mexico.