Analyzing critical legal trends and developments across data, cyber, AI and digital regulations from around the world and beyond borders

In brief

On 16 June 2025, the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament reached a political agreement on a new regulation introducing additional procedural rules for the enforcement of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in cross-border matters (“Regulation“).

The new Regulation seeks to fix the delays and inconsistencies that have undermined the handling of cross-border GDPR complaints. It sets out a common set of rules for how national data protection authorities cooperate, how complaints are processed and how parties are heard — bringing more clarity and predictability to enforcement across the EU.

Businesses engaged in cross-border data processing should begin assessing the practical implications of the new procedural requirements, particularly in relation to the defined timelines, enhanced rights for complainants and more formalized cooperation with supervisory authorities.

To understand how these changes may affect your business and how best to prepare, please contact your usual Baker McKenzie contact.


Contents

  1. Background: the need for reform
  2. Key features of the new Regulation
  3. Next steps
  4. Implications for businesses

Background: the need for reform

Since its entry into force in 2018, the GDPR has provided a robust legal framework for data protection across the EU. However, its enforcement — particularly in cross-border contexts — has been shaped by procedural complexity, fragmented practices among supervisory authorities and significant delays in resolving complaints.

Under the current regime, the lead supervisory authority is responsible for investigating cross-border complaints, in cooperation with other concerned authorities. This cooperation, governed by Article 60 of the GDPR, has proven to be complex and, at times, inefficient.

Investigations have often taken years to conclude, and the lack of harmonized procedural rules has led to inconsistent treatment of complaints and uncertainty for both individuals and businesses. The European Commission acknowledged these shortcomings and published the present proposal on 4 July 2023.

The proposal seeks to establish a coherent procedural framework to complement — not amend — the existing GDPR enforcement mechanism. It includes measures to harmonize the cooperation between data protection authorities, the handling of complaints and the rights of parties involved in enforcement proceedings. It also establishes clear timelines for each stage of cooperation and dispute resolution. 

Key features of the new Regulation

The political agreement that has been reached confirms the core objectives of the European Commission’s original proposal while introducing practical improvements.

Under the terms of the agreement, the Regulation will introduce the following:

  • 15-month deadline for the completion of investigations in cross-border cases, with the possibility of a 12-month extension in particularly complex matters.
  • 12-month deadline for simpler cooperation procedures.

The Regulation also provides for a standardized complaint form and common admissibility criteria, ensuring that complaints are assessed consistently across member states. 

Both the parties under review and the complainants will have the right to access and comment on preliminary findings before a final decision is adopted, reinforcing procedural fairness and transparency.

In addition, the Regulation introduces a new early resolution mechanism, allowing supervisory authorities to resolve complaints at an earlier stage before involving other national authorities. This is expected to reduce the administrative burden and accelerate outcomes. The role of the European Data Protection Board in resolving disputes between authorities will also be clarified and streamlined.

Together, these measures are expected to strengthen the consistency, transparency and timeliness of GDPR enforcement in cross-border contexts.

Next steps

The provisional agreement will now need to be formally adopted by both the European Parliament and the Council. Once adopted, the new Regulation will be directly applicable across the EU without the need for national implementation.

Implications for businesses

Businesses should start reviewing their internal procedures now to ensure they are prepared for the new enforcement landscape.

The reform represents a significant step toward greater predictability and efficiency in the enforcement of the GDPR, especially for large multinationals operating across several member states.

Author

Annie Elfassi is the Partner in charge of the Litigation and Employment departments of Baker McKenzie's Luxembourg office. She has over 19 years of experience. Prior to joining the Firm in 2019, Annie Elfassi was a member of the Litigation and Risk Management practice and headed the Employment department of a leading law firm in Luxembourg.

Author

Valérie Kopéra is a counsel in the Litigation and Employment practice groups of Baker McKenzie's Luxembourg office. She joined the Firm on 1 February 2024. Valérie has almost 20 years of experience in Luxembourg business matters. She started her career as a tax adviser at one of the Big Four firms before focusing on corporate, banking and finance matters at a major local law firm. After almost a decade of legal advisory at internationally renowned firms and a short experience at a bank, Valérie decided to focus on business litigation, drawing on her extensive consulting experience. She worked for nearly eight years in a leading law firm as counsel and litigation attorney, before running her own practice and finally heading the litigation and dispute resolution department as a partner of a local law firm

Author

Sabrina Bodson is a counsel in the Employment Practice Group of Baker McKenzie's Luxembourg office. She has over 15 years of experience. Prior to joining the Firm in 2022, Sabrina was a counsel in the employment department of a Magic Circle firm in Luxembourg. She is a frequent speaker on employment law issues in seminars and conferences and contributor to various employment law related publications.